brokerfutures

Tradeify Trading Journal: Growth, Select, Lightning and the Trailing Floor

Last updated: August 27, 2026

Tradeify is one of the newer entrants in the futures prop firm space, and one thing is worth clearing up before anything else: every Tradeify plan uses END-OF-DAY TRAILING drawdown. None is static. Plenty of write-ups — including an earlier version of this page — describe the Advanced plan as having a fixed floor; Advanced was never static, and Tradeify now marks it legacy and sells only Growth, Select and Lightning. Planning around a floor that does not move when it actually does is how accounts get busted while still in profit. This guide covers the current lineup, what the trailing floor means for how you journal, importing from Tradovate, and the multi-account workflow.

Tradeify's plan lineup

Lightning (1-step EOD trailing)

Tradeify's entry-level eval. Single-step evaluation with profit target, EOD trailing drawdown, and daily loss limit. Mechanically similar to MFFU Rapid or Apex EOD — pass the profit target without busting the trailing floor or daily loss budget. Lightning is the right pick for traders comfortable with trailing drawdown rules.

Growth and Select

The two evaluation routes. Growth is the cheapest entry and carries a daily loss limit alongside a 35% consistency rule. Select costs a little more, drops the daily loss limit during evaluation and applies 40% consistency instead — the better fit if your losing days are occasionally large. Both use the same end-of-day trailing drawdown as Lightning.

No Tradeify plan is static — and Advanced is retired

This is the single most common misconception about Tradeify, and an earlier version of this page repeated it. Growth, Select and Lightning all trail at end of day; none has a floor fixed at (account size − max DD). The claim traces back to the Advanced plan, which was never static either and which Tradeify now labels legacy — the current pricing reference lists three account types and Advanced is not among them. If you still hold one, its rules are unchanged, but it is no longer sold.

Growth vs Select vs Lightning — which to pick

The decision depends mostly on your trading style and tolerance for trailing-drawdown risk:

FactorGrowthSelectLightning
Drawdown floorTrails the end-of-day highTrails the end-of-day highTrails the end-of-day high
EvaluationRequiredRequiredNone — funded instantly
Daily loss limitYesNot during evaluationYes
Consistency rule35%40% in evaluation20% → 25% → 30%
ResetsAvailableAvailableNone

Because the drawdown engine is identical across all three, this is a cost-and-rules decision rather than a risk-structure one. The genuine differences are the daily loss limit and the consistency requirement, and those are worth matching to how your losing days actually look.

Coming from an Apex intraday eval?

The upgrade is real but smaller than it is usually sold as. Moving to any Tradeify plan takes you from an INTRADAY trail — which moves your floor on unrealised profit while a position is still open — to an END-OF-DAY trail, which only looks at the close. That removes the wick-into-profit failure mode. It does not give you a fixed floor, so a strong run still walks the wall up behind you.

Tradeify's drawdown math

Lightning (EOD trailing)

EOD trailing drawdown — the floor recalculates only at session close based on the highest end-of-day balance. Mechanically identical to Apex EOD, MFFU Rapid, and TopStep. Daily loss limit applies in addition.

Growth and Select

Also EOD trailing. Your headroom is (current balance − current floor), and the floor is not a constant: it is derived from your highest end-of-day balance so far. Any calculation that treats it as fixed at (account size − max DD) will overstate your remaining room, and the overstatement grows the further into profit you go.

Daily loss limit

Growth and Lightning enforce a per-session daily loss limit; Select does not during evaluation. Hitting the limit closes the account for the session but doesn't bust permanently. Hitting the trailing drawdown floor permanently busts the account.

TradersForge handles every Tradeify plan

Pick Growth, Select or Lightning as your account template and the drawdown engine tracks the end-of-day trailing floor from your actual fills, alongside the session daily-loss budget where the plan has one. The /tools/prop-firm-drawdown-calculator covers all three for quick what-if math.

Track your Tradeify account live — start free14-day free trial · Pro from $10/mo

Setting up TradersForge for Tradeify

Tradeify accounts trade through Tradovate. The setup is the standard Tradovate workflow plus the Tradeify prop firm template:

  1. Create a TradersForge account (free tier works for testing; Pro from $10/mo unlocks live drawdown tracking).
  2. In Import & Connect, choose Connect Tradovate and authorize. Read-only — no order placement, no withdrawals.
  3. Navigate to Prop Firms → Add Account. Select "Tradeify" → choose your plan → choose your account size.
  4. Link the Tradovate account to the Tradeify prop firm account. Trades route automatically.
  5. For backfill: Tradovate Performance.csv covers trades; Cash History.csv covers exact fees.
  6. Optional: enable drawdown alerts. On any Tradeify plan the alert fires as headroom to the end-of-day trailing floor shrinks.

What the trailing floor means for your daily review

Because all three plans share the same drawdown engine, the review discipline is the same on every one of them — and it is not optional on any.

Track the gap, not the balance

Ask where the floor sits today versus yesterday. A green day lifts the floor, so some of what you just made is immediately spoken for. A red day does not lower it, so headroom shrinks. The gap between current balance and current floor is the number that decides whether the account survives, and it is not visible in your P&L.

The end-of-day close is the only reading that counts

This is the one genuine mercy in Tradeify's structure. A run-up you give back inside the session never touches the floor, because only the closing balance is recorded — unlike an intraday trail, where the peak itself moves the wall. So an ugly round trip within a day costs you nothing structurally. Finishing a day at a new high does.

Setup-level expectancy needs care on a trailing plan

A setup producing 5R wins followed by 1R losses looks profitable in raw expectancy but can still hurt you here, because the 5R win closes the day at a new high, lifts the floor, and the following 1R loss eats into freshly reduced headroom. Judge setups on raw R for strategy quality, then separately on what they do to your floor. Those are two different questions and a trailing plan makes them diverge.

Multi-account workflow at Tradeify

Many traders run several Tradeify accounts at once. Since the plans share a drawdown engine, this diversifies cost and rule structure rather than risk mechanics — worth being clear-eyed about, because a mix of plans does not hedge you against a trailing floor:

  1. Connect each Tradovate account separately to TradersForge.
  2. Link each Tradovate account to its specific Tradeify template (Growth, Select or Lightning at the right size).
  3. Use the multi-account dashboard to see every Tradeify account side by side, each with its own end-of-day trailing floor and remaining daily-loss budget.
  4. Set drawdown alerts globally — get notified when any account approaches its floor.
  5. Per-account analytics surface which plan and size actually suit your style, which is the useful comparison once drawdown mechanics are held constant.
If Apex Intraday has busted you before

Any Tradeify plan is a structural improvement, because end-of-day trailing removes the failure mode that catches most people on Apex Intraday — a position running into profit and coming back, moving your floor on money you never banked. Be clear about what it does not fix: your floor still rises every time you finish a day at a new high. This is a smaller trailing problem, not the absence of one.

Tradeify journaling gotchas

Picking the right template

Plans differ on profit target, daily loss limit and consistency requirement, so the wrong template gives you wrong numbers even though the drawdown TYPE is the same across all of them. Check your Tradeify dashboard or purchase confirmation for the exact plan and size before configuring TradersForge — and if you hold a legacy Advanced account, say so, since it is no longer in the standard picker.

Two limits can end you, not one

On every Tradeify plan the daily loss limit sits on top of the trailing floor, and either can end your day or your account independently. Plenty of traders watch the drawdown carefully and get closed out by the session limit instead. Keep both numbers in front of you.

Tradovate fees on Tradeify accounts

Standard Tradovate-passed-through fees apply (~$1.12 round-trip per micro contract). Performance.csv shows gross P&L; Cash History.csv shows exact fees. Importing both gives precise net P&L tracking.

Plan switching

If you move between Tradeify plans, your TradersForge tracking needs the new plan template. Either edit the existing account's template or create a new account with the new plan and migrate trade history — the drawdown engine is the same, but targets, daily loss limits and consistency rules are not.

TradersForge Journal

Put this guide into practice — free.

TradersForge is a futures-first trading journal with automatic broker sync, native prop-firm drawdown tracking, and AI trade reviews. Signup starts a 14-day free Elite trial — no card required.

Live broker sync13 firms built-inIntraday warnings
Track it free for 14 daysNo card required · Pro from $10/mo after
50K EVALLive
Distance to line
$412
EquityTrailing max-loss line

Frequently asked questions

Does Tradeify have a built-in trading journal?

Tradeify provides a dashboard with current balance, the end-of-day trailing drawdown floor, daily loss budget and trade history. Adequate as a scoreboard but no setup tagging, journal entries, cross-account view or AI review. Active Tradeify traders typically pair the dashboard with a separate journal.

What's the difference between Tradeify Growth, Select and Lightning?

All three use end-of-day trailing drawdown — the floor moves up as your highest end-of-day balance grows. Tradeify has no plan with a fixed floor. Growth carries a daily loss limit and a 35% consistency rule; Select drops the daily loss limit during evaluation and applies 40%; Lightning skips the evaluation entirely and steps its consistency rule 20% → 25% → 30%. They differ on cost and rules, not on drawdown mechanics.

Does Tradeify have a static or fixed drawdown plan?

It does not have one. Every current Tradeify plan uses end-of-day trailing drawdown: the floor is derived from your highest closing balance, rises as you profit and never comes back down. Guides describing a Tradeify floor computed once at account creation and never recalculated are describing the retired Advanced plan — inaccurately, since Advanced trailed too. Compute headroom as (current balance − current floor) and recompute it after every session that closes at a new high.

Why would I pick Lightning over Growth or Select?

Lightning skips the evaluation entirely — you are funded on purchase — which is worth the higher one-off price if you have already proven you can pass evaluations elsewhere and simply want to trade. The trade-offs are real: no resets, so a failed Lightning account must be repurchased outright, and a progressive consistency rule that tightens 20% → 25% → 30%. If you are still building consistency, Growth or Select at a lower entry price with resets available is the cheaper way to find out.

How do I import Tradeify trades into TradersForge?

Tradeify accounts trade through Tradovate. The standard Tradovate workflow applies — connect the Tradovate account via API for live sync, or drop a Performance.csv (trades) plus Cash History.csv (exact fees) for backfill. Trades route to the linked Tradeify prop firm account automatically.

Can I run several Tradeify accounts simultaneously?

Yes — Pro supports up to 10 prop firm accounts, Elite supports unlimited. Different accounts can be on different Tradeify plans, and per-account analytics show which plan and size actually suit your style.

Does the prop firm drawdown calculator support Tradeify?

Yes — /tools/prop-firm-drawdown-calculator covers Growth, Select and Lightning, all on the end-of-day trailing model. For continuous live tracking, the full TradersForge product applies the rules to every fill automatically.

Read next

Tradovate Trading Journal: Setup, Import, and Automation

Tradovate is one of the most popular futures trading platforms among active retail and prop firm traders — and one of the easiest brokers to journal automatically because of its clean CSV exports and well-documented API. This guide covers what Tradovate's built-in tools handle, what they miss, and the three ways to set up a real trading journal connected to your Tradovate account: manual logging, CSV import, or live API integration.

Futures Trading Journal Template: What to Track and How

A futures trading journal isn't just a spreadsheet of trades — it's the feedback loop that turns a discretionary trader into a consistent one. This guide covers every field a futures journal needs, why each matters, and how to set it up either as a spreadsheet you maintain manually or as an automated journal that pulls trades from your broker. Heavy emphasis on what futures-specific journaling requires that stock or options journals don't.

R-Multiple Tracking Explained: Measuring Trades by Risk, Not Dollars

Most traders evaluate themselves by P&L: "I made $400 today." But P&L tells you almost nothing about whether you traded well. A $400 win on a $2,000 risk is a poor trade. A $400 win on a $100 risk is excellent. R-multiple is the unit that fixes this — it normalizes every trade by the risk you took, so a 2R day is a 2R day whether you risked $50 or $5,000. This guide covers what R-multiple is, how to compute it correctly, why it's the unit that separates serious traders from gamblers, and how to track it across futures, stocks, options, and forex.

Related prop firm reviews